Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP) Practice Exam. Prepare with multiple choice questions, each accompanied by hints and explanations. Get ready to ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What best describes 'design for service' as a simplification type?

  1. A focus on aesthetic appeal

  2. Product designs made easier for maintenance and servicing

  3. Minimizing available features for cost reduction

  4. exclusively for new product development

The correct answer is: Product designs made easier for maintenance and servicing

'Design for service' as a simplification type emphasizes creating product designs that facilitate easier maintenance and servicing. This approach is crucial in supply chain management, as it enhances the overall product lifecycle, reduces downtime, and improves customer satisfaction. By considering serviceability during the design phase, products can be constructed with features that allow for quicker repairs, simpler part replacements, and easier access for technicians. For instance, if a product can be disassembled without special tools or if components are standardized, it can be maintained more efficiently. This ultimately leads to lower operational costs for both the producer and the consumer, while also ensuring that products remain functional over a longer period, ultimately benefiting both parties. In contrast, options that focus solely on aesthetic appeal or minimizing features can neglect the practical aspects of serviceability. While aesthetics may enhance customer attraction, if the product is difficult to repair, it may result in dissatisfaction. Features designed strictly for cost reduction can inadvertently complicate servicing, leading to higher long-term expenses. Additionally, restricting 'design for service' to new product development excludes existing products that could benefit from serviceability improvements, limiting broader strategic advantages in supply chain operations.